Police Say Man Attacked Cop, Bystanders Intervened
“You never know what can happen. This is exactly why we can’t afford to lay any cops off.” ~ Sam Pangaldi, a volunteer firefighter and zoning board member who aided a Lawrence Township police officer who was struggling with a suspect Friday evening.
A “routine” traffic stop in Lawrence Township this evening (Friday, May 4) suddenly escalated into a frightening altercation when a man allegedly attacked the police officer who had pulled him over for talking on a cell phone while driving.
Seeing the lone officer struggling with the combative 6-foot, 5-inch, 275-pound suspect, two bystanders jumped into the fray and helped subdue the man prior to the arrival of additional officers.
Following his arrest this evening outside the Quick Chek convenience store off Brunswick Circle Extension, the suspect – Warren Bell, 33, whose last known address was in Somerset County – was charged with aggravated assault on a police officer, resisting arrest and obstructing justice, as well as several motor vehicle violations, according to Sgt. Tim Drew.
Officer Richard Laird III, the officer Bell allegedly fought, suffered minor scrapes and bruises in the tussle but was otherwise not injured, Drew said. Bell, who was exposed to pepper spray during the fight, was taken to a Trenton hospital to receive a precautionary exam, he added.
Drew said it was just before 6:20 p.m. when Laird, patrolling the south side of the township, observed Bell allegedly talking on a cell phone while driving along Princeton Avenue. He said Laird attempted to initiate a traffic stop by pulling behind Bell’s vehicle and activating his patrol car’s warning lights, but Bell allegedly did not stop until he drove his vehicle into the Quick Chek lot and had pulled up in front of one of the store’s gas pumps.
“During the course of the stop, Mr. Bell exited his vehicle, disregarding Officer Laird’s commands to stay in the car. He then went to the other side of the car and was reaching under the passenger’s seat in a very suspicious manner,” Drew said. “Unsure what Mr. Bell may have been trying to retrieve, Officer Laird gave him multiple orders to get his hands out from where he had them and get back in the car.”
When Bell allegedly refused to obey the officer’s commands, Laird advised him he was under arrest. “After he was told he was under arrest, a struggle ensued at which time he shoved and attempted to punch Officer Laird several times,” Drew related. “With the assistance of some bystanders he was taken into custody, without any serious injuries to the officer or the accused.”
One of those bystanders was Sam Pangaldi, a volunteer firefighter at Slackwood Fire Co. who also serves as a member of the Lawrence Township Zoning Board of Adjustment.
Pangaldi was in his vehicle refueling at one of the other nearby gas pumps when he saw Laird’s patrol car – its warning lights on – pull up behind Bell’s car.
At first, he said, it looked like any other traffic stop you’d see in Lawrence Township. He said Laird approached the car, had a brief conversation with the driver and went back to his patrol car, presumably to check the license and other documents the driver had handed over.
But then, he said, the driver – Bell – got out of his seat and walked around to the passenger’s side of his own car.
“[Laird] said, ‘I told you to stay in your car.’ He told him four or five times to get back in the car,” Pangaldi related.
Pangaldi said Bell ignored Laird’s orders and started reaching into the car. “There was no telling what he was fumbling for,” he said. “He could have had anything in there.”
When Laird went to arrest Bell, Bell began to struggle, Pangaldi said. “He wouldn’t cooperate. He was a big guy. He wasn’t going down.”
The struggle escalated, to where it was obvious Laird was in trouble, he said. He said he immediately grabbed his cell phone and called the direct line to the township police station, since 911 calls made with cell phones often first go to a centralized state police call center.
But there was no immediate answer, since township police dispatchers – having lost radio contact with Laird – were franticly trying to direct backup officers to Laird’s last known location.
So Pangaldi tossed down his phone and ran over to help. He said Laird had managed to grab hold of one of Bell’s hands, but Bell’s other hand was still loose. “I was afraid where the guy’s hand was. It was close to [Laird’s] gun,” he said.
He said he helped Laird control Bell enough for Bell to be handcuffed and then put in the back of Laird’s patrol car. Another bystander whom Pangaldi did not know also stepped in to assist.
“No one else wanted to get involved,” Pangaldi said in disbelief. “But everybody had their iPhones out videoing the whole thing.”
Sgt. Drew said police thus far have no idea why Bell acted the way he did.
Pangaldi is similarly mystified. “All he had to do was sit down and there wouldn’t have been any commotion,” he said. “All he had to do was sit down.”
For his part, Pangaldi doesn’t consider himself a hero. But he said the incident should serve as a wakeup call for Lawrence Township residents and council members who might think layoffs are the way to balance the township’s budget problems.
“I don’t want to see anyone lose their jobs, but you definitely can’t touch emergency services,” he said. “You never know what can happen. This is exactly why we can’t afford to lay any cops off.”
old timer
12:29 am on Saturday, May 5, 2012
Way to go Sam.....another volunteer who serves his community in many ways . Proud to know you !!!
JD Donahue
12:33 am on Saturday, May 5, 2012
Maybe we cannot lay off policemen, but we need to lay off the pay increases. I am a federal worker and my pay will be frozen for the next 3 years. Why do municipal workers get pay raises in an economy with 8.2 percent unemployment? We have the highest property taxes in the nation. People do not want to live in NJ because of the taxes.
Joe Friday
1:10 am on Saturday, May 5, 2012
JD, these cops took a 1.5 % pay decrease in 2011 due to increased pensions contributions. They took a 0% pay raise in 2010 voluntarily. These same cops volunteered to pay 1.5% of their pay for medical insurance before they were required to do so. These same cops are now facing layoffs, demotions, and no pay increases for the forseeable future. In addition, these same officers are going to be paying up to 35% of the cost of their medical insurance in the next three years. All in all, the average police officer in Lawrenceville and every other town in New Jersey is looking at a pay decrease of 10K or more from 2010 courtesy of Gov. Christie and the legislature. By state law, they have been limited to a maximum raise of 2% in arbitration and most arbitrators are giving MUCH lower raises then that. These same officers who had collectively bargained years ago for 15 year os medical benefits paid for by the town upon retirement and NOT LIFETIME medical like many other municipalities did lost their medical in retirement and will now have to pay for a portion of the premium if they did not have 20 years in the PFRS pension as of June 2011 courtesy of Gov. Christie and the legislature.
I would say it is fair to say that the cops and firefighters of New Jersey are giving up plenty for us the taxpayers and for themselves, considering that the are required to live in NJ also.
In the meantime, the cost of living has increased and continues to do so.
JD is that enough for you?
Joe Russo
7:54 am on Saturday, May 5, 2012
"Routine" traffic stops, and the atrocious ambush attacks directed at Police Officers are routinely discussed on the facebook page, Lawrence FOP. Police are War combattants, facing gunfire, knife, physical assaults, similar to the military, Police are always the "point man", the first in line, alone, without a Squad of soldiers for immediate backup. The arrestee was probably read his Miranda "Rights", after he resisted arrest, courtesy of the Supreme Court. The officer could have been killed, as happens too frequently. 143 Officers died on duty last year, in America. You can apply for Associate Membership in Lawrence FOP Chapter 209, the William C. Eggert Chapter. Three levels of membership, which include, Wallet Fob, window sticker, membership card, Shield for your rear window. Stop into the Police Station and an application will be mailed to you. In the meantime, checkout Lawrence FOP on facebook. Click become a friend.
Lawrence Love
2:20 pm on Sunday, May 6, 2012
Mr. Russo - why is it that you continue to infiltrate every social media site, make comments that do not make much sense, and attempt to convince people to visit the website of whatever company you may be representing? You are the same guy that supports and promotes "Officer Safety", but drives around taking photos and distracting Police Officers in the performance of their duties!
Explain what your skills and abilities are, and explain your membership with the FOP?
Mary
8:17 am on Saturday, May 5, 2012
Thank you Sam Pangaldi. It is much easier to be a bystander and take pictures with your iPhone. I didn't have to be there, and wasn't, to appreciate what Sam Pangaldi did.
maggie smith
8:38 am on Saturday, May 5, 2012
Great Job Sam you are a perfect example to all Lawrence citizens
OM Nicely
9:16 am on Saturday, May 5, 2012
From reading the Patch, I've learned there's more crime in Lawrence than I ever realized. That's more than enough reason not to reduce emergency services. In this case, Mr. Pangaldi indeed deserves recognition. This incident could have turned into a tragedy for the police officer. Consider that driver in front of you may be the next crime suspect. After all, he/she is already breaking the traffic laws, right? Watch your speed.
NoBargainBasement
10:27 am on Saturday, May 5, 2012
Another clear example that Lawrence Twp. is NOT Mayberry (very safe with little crime for those who don't get the implication) for those that have implied it is. Based on the national average ratio of police officer to population, Lawrence should have around 80 officers. They are at around 65 currently. Proper staffing in public safety is not something to toy with..
It needs to be reiterated that Lawrence Twp. paid tens of thousands last year to hire a consultant to analyze the police department and the consultant concluded that the town is basically operating as a skeleton of a department and that ANY reduction from current staffing levels would be detrimental to effective police services to the town; however, it did conclude that the Deputy Chief position was unnecessary in a department such a Lawrence. Any possible layoffs, however, would come from the bottom...the rank and file who actually provide the bulk of the service to the town...this would make zero sense and basically would tell the citizens that Lawrence Twp. threw away tens of thousands of dollars on that consultant. What sense does it make to pay a consultant to do a job that I guess the manager felt neither he nor the police chief could do, and then completely disregard those recommendations. It also seems odd that I don't recall seeing much media attention on the results of both the consultant's findings and the morale survey the consultant requested from the officers, which I hear was not too favorable.
Lville Rob
11:57 am on Saturday, May 5, 2012
The Matrix report did not say the LPD is operating as a skeleton of a department. It said it was appropriately staffed at the officer level. See the Patch story and a link to the report here: http://lawrenceville.patch.com/articles/lawrence-township-police-study-released-to-public
Richard
1:58 pm on Saturday, May 5, 2012
Allegedly there is a epidemic of hiring of consultants in Lawrence Township. Many, many thousands of dollars are spent even in the schools system for consultation and, arbitration sometimes for trifle arguments amongst employees. The township allegedly even pays for their airfare and, dining to accomplish something so simple that should be taken care of with our paid employees of that department. The idea of cutting police officers because there is no tax increase on our properties is beyond insane. There is too much waste going on....and, it would be great to go back into the books of past mayors, etc. to follow the paper trail of who, when and, where our hard earned money was wasted. It's time to hold folks accountable .
Lawrence Love
2:54 pm on Sunday, May 6, 2012
Even if Lawrence Township was running on a skeleton crew, it wouldn't discount the fact one of the officer's made a traffic stop and met a violent offender! 1000 police officers or just two - you can run into anything at anytime! No amount of money in the budget would have stopped this from happening!
Commoncents
1:19 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
@Lawrence Love. You are correct, violent offenders are an occurrence that any officer can met at any time. However, if the budget would allow for proper staffing, the department could man each patrol unit with 2 officers in each. Thus allowing every officer to have back-up at all times. Running on a "skeleton crew" does not allow for enough manpower to operate 2 man cars. By having the bare minimum of officers working at any given time, means that officers are responding and handling calls alone, for either the entire duration of the incident or while waiting for back-up to arrive. The time it can take for a back-up unit to respond, arrive and intervene could mean life or death for either the officer or the suspect.
So yes, it can happen to anyone at any time. But why would we consciously ignore the fact that two officers are needed on almost every situation, and why would we chose to "roll the dice" and hope that no one gets hurt or killed in this recipe for disaster. The simple fact is that there is not enough cops. It is a lot easier to put one cop in one car and "POOF" there are more cops on the streets. This is just a mirage, when in fact that single man car is simply one piece to the puzzle. You need 2, 3, sometimes the whole shift to handle a call. So my recommendation.... hire more cops in order to have two man cars. Lets not continue this game of burying our heads as Lawrence is not "Mayberry" and there are violent criminals in our own back yards!!
Turkturt
11:16 am on Saturday, May 5, 2012
Thanks Sam.
Turkturt
11:19 am on Saturday, May 5, 2012
Hopefully this is also a wake up call to the cops in the department who are out of shape and can't handle themselves. It's your job to be prepared. What would happen without the civilians. That's what the officer should be thinking.
Commoncents
1:44 pm on Saturday, May 5, 2012
Turk you're right that everyone in law enforcement needs to always be prepared for the worst and be ready to fight. But it didn't appear to be a fair fight considering the suspect was 6 foot 5 inches and almost 300lbs. He must have been nearly a half foot taller and probably 100 lbs more than the officer. The article said the officer suffered just minor injuries. For fighting someone that big shouldn't he have been knocked out or severely injured if he wasn't prepared?
Chief Wahoo
11:21 am on Saturday, May 5, 2012
The cops in every town in the state, could have as many cops as they needed IF they were not so greedy and selfish......They are overpaid and simple economics has finally proved that......and none of this would be an issue, If they really cared about the publics safety (and theirs)
Smarty
12:51 pm on Saturday, May 5, 2012
I think the president is overpaid to. If he cared about our country he would work for free. And all public servants for that matter. Why should we value the lives of heros anyway. They should all work for free. And wear capes too. Yeah. And have super powers. Yeah. From this day on all cops work for free because they care about public safety and not their lives and their families. Why should their families Eat. Come on they are heros. They shouldnt need food they can just refuel their bodies with mystical rocks and Krispy Cream donuts.
Jersey shore
1:47 pm on Saturday, May 5, 2012
I am proud that a resident took the iniaitive without consideration of his own safety to help in a situation that could have ended tragically . All the by sttanders better hope Sam is around if they should need assistance. Forget the politics, this was an eye opening event, regardless .
Militant J
4:03 pm on Saturday, May 5, 2012
A trained officer who takes pride in himself and his job should be able to handle himself. This was a man vs an officer who has tools that can be used to subdue a larger enemy if needed. The officer should always win because they should be mentally and physically prepared. If the fight was unfair it was weighed heavier to the side of the officer given his tools and weapons. If he failed to do so it is time for him to train or rethink his job. Without the help of civilians this officer could have put a gun on the street. His own and in the hands of someone who obviously doesn't have a care in the world.
Joe Blow
4:53 pm on Saturday, May 5, 2012
This is another prime example why NJ should allow the use of Tasers. This guy could have been warned and when he didn't heed the warning gotten tazed. Game over NO confrontation No hassles and no need for public assistance. I'm just glad somebody was willing to get involved and help this officer out.
Lawrencevillegal
5:46 pm on Saturday, May 5, 2012
Love the cops!
I also love talking on my cell phone (hands free) while driving (hands on the wheel).
Hank
6:11 pm on Saturday, May 5, 2012
Tasers are legal in jersey. Lawrence just doesn't have any. Guess its not in the budget.
Katie Quill LaMont
8:24 pm on Saturday, May 5, 2012
I personally know the officer and Sam. I watched those boys grow into men. The officer himself is more then adequate in mental and physical preparedness. He put himself in situation that he didn't think twice about because he was doing his job . He wasn't thinking about his pay or own safety. Because that's his JOB.. So maybe before the public starts pulling out their cell phones or crunching tax dollars in their head, they should think about the obviously dangerous man he just took off the streets for THEIR own safety. Great job RJ and Sam !!!!
Anthony
11:54 pm on Saturday, May 5, 2012
thanks sam, we need your type for lawrence township, TC
Anthony
11:57 pm on Saturday, May 5, 2012
thanks sam, that guy could have had a gun or weapon in the car and your quick help could have very well have saved this officer. good job and your clear thinking I hope is appricated on the zoning board, Karin
Tom Regan
7:12 am on Sunday, May 6, 2012
Anyone who believes that the police, fire or other rescue departments are overpaid and do not care about public safety should have to wear a special badge so that the police know not to help them when their life is in danger. As far as i am concerned - they put their lives on the line everyday when they suit up for work. They deserve better pay and benfits and definitely better respect from all of the bystanders who stand by with their video phones.
I will always support and respect police, fire and rescue in Lawrence and anywhere in the USA.
Thank you men and women of these safety departments - I am forever on your side.
Stinki Garbaage
7:18 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Tom, I think we all support the police. What the fiscally responsible people are saying is that we need stronger representative government that will not blackmail the people into keeping the police staffing appropriate. the incumbent administration continues to allow and recommend the continuation of longevity pay (at 430K+ per year for all township employees) and 2.3M in un-accumulated sick days. No attempt to draw that down or stop these ridiculous perks will mean they need to cut somewhere else. The tax payers are not a bottomless slush fund. 60% tax increase in 9 years for the same services is inexcusable and the entire administration needs to go.
realize they pay 430K+ per year in retention (as is people need incentive to stay in a job as easy (except for police and fire) and lucrative as being a municipal employee. so until they show a serious effort at really reducing expenses, we will have this issue. 10 years until this gets fixed, at least.
how many people reading this get a bonus from their company for staying in their job EVERY year? that's what we the tax payers are paying for every policeman, clerk, tax collector, tax assessor, recreation dept, parks dept. Every single person that's been here 8 years gets a bonus check for staying in their job. To the tune of 400K+ per year, every year. most people get a $200 watch after 20 years and a pat on the back. in Lawrecneville we give clerks $2,300 per year. PER YEAR!!!!!!!
wake up, people!
Patrick
12:30 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Max, you got what you wanted... to go through the budget with council... so maybe you should stop bitching, and tell us what you want to cut. right? you must have seen numbers at this point. is it police? cause what else is a big number.
Chief Wahoo
11:17 am on Sunday, May 6, 2012
I would gladly wear that badge as long as you take their costs of salary , health benefits and bloated pensions off of me at the threat of losing my house
4GreaterGood
1:48 pm on Sunday, May 6, 2012
@Chief - you're an idiot. It's not the servicemen and women fault that you cannot afford your house. It's yours. Maybe you shouldn't have bought a house you cannot afford to live in comfortably. The cost of living continues to increase and it should have been thought about before you made a purchase. It's also not their fault that you most likely have a low paying job, that does not allow you to continue up the chain of command, therefore, leaving you with the same salary you had 10 years ago. These men and women risk their lives, safety, mental and physical health every single day. They go to work knowing they could never return. You live in the comforts of your home knowing your only risk is going to work in the morning and getting in an accident.
What noble profession do you do? What do you do for the greater good of our community? Probably nothing. Yes, half our services are paid, but what about the volunteers? I guess you don't want their help either. You're an uneducated resident who would stand by and watch things fall apart, rather than than take the initiative to do something better. I hope you get exactly what you want. You want to wear that badge? What if your house burns and no one shows up? What if you need EMT or police services? Then you cannot blame anyone but yourself. Karma will come your way my friend.
Lawrence Love
2:25 pm on Sunday, May 6, 2012
This incident is a perfect example of why officers in NJ should carry Tazers. From what I understand, Pepper Spray did not work at all, and if not for the help of bystanders, Officer Laird would have no choice but to use deadly force and shoot this individual.
Nj Abrams
9:20 pm on Sunday, May 6, 2012
In nj the rule is you only use a taser in a lethal capacity. It's tasers are legal for law enforcement in nj but can only be used as lethal force. So basically it's just another piece of junk to weigh down their belt.
Jake
1:48 am on Monday, May 7, 2012
A taser can be a good tool if it's supported by laws with common sense, but NJ's policy on tasers is plain ignorant. If used only/largely as an alternative in deadly force scenarios, all it's going to do is bring more "Monday morning quarerbacking" from liberal idiots or those playing the race card. These people will inevitably say that an officer should have used his taser instead of his firearm after a suspect is shot dead justifiably. These are the same idiots that say things like "why couldn't the officer have shot the knife out of that 'kid's' hand..."that kid was a nice boy (even though he was a known gang member with previous felony arrests) and did not deserve to die just because he menaced an officer with a knife..."
It's a great tool for severe disobedience and resisting, but to limit it to deadly situations is plain stupid. It will just make officers hesitate when there's no time for hesitation and jeopardize officer safety. If an officer chooses to use it in a deadly force situation, more power to him, but if an officer is confronted with a gun or a knife, the firearm is the way to go generally speaking. If you don't want to lose your life, don't confront the authorities in a deadly manner...common sense.
Stupid Me
6:02 pm on Monday, May 7, 2012
Jake review the law
John
9:08 am on Monday, May 7, 2012
As NJ law currently stands, tasers are only allowed in deadly force situations. With them being over regulated, it would be a nuisance for the officers to carry and and an unnecessary expense at a time when tight budgets do not allow for duplication. If police have firearms then they do not need tasers. Carrying too much equipment is more hazardous than helpful. Until NJ deems the use of tasers to be on the same level as pepper spray, it would remain a waste of money and place officers in danger physically and legally.
Stupid Me
6:03 pm on Monday, May 7, 2012
Jake and John you sound like the same person. Review the law
bark34
12:14 pm on Monday, May 7, 2012
Frankly I would have loved to have been there to help the officer out. Any chance I can get to freely beat some sense into total morons who have no respect for any law enforcement...
Lisa Burke
4:50 pm on Monday, May 7, 2012
There's a lot to be said about this situation but one thing right now strikes me clearly: If Tasers are legal, Lawrence Township Police should have them. It would have been horrible if Officer Laird had to resort to deadly force when he could have, in the absence of interested citizens like Pangaldi, had the option of a Taser to quell the situation and protect the public. The reality is our Police Officers put their lives on the line every day to protect us. We, as residents, should be supporting and in fact promoting every safety possible to assist them in protecting us.
OldWiseOne
5:19 pm on Monday, May 7, 2012
Glad to see the cell phone laws being vigorously enforced. Can we get this gentlemens cell phone privilege suspended for two years and have a couple grand surcharge levied for restoration?
Jake
12:39 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
StupidMe: Please inform me as to what I'm missing? Does the NJ law allow for the use of tasers on persons resisting arrest or being noncomplaint to orders. I can't find that anywhere. So please send me a link to prove your point.
Attorney General Dow said: "The new policy continues to restrict use of stun guns, for the most part, to situations where an officer seeks to prevent a suspect from causing death or serious bodily injury to an officer, to another person, or to himself or herself. Law enforcement officers may not use them against a person who is only offering passive resistance to commands."
John
8:00 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
No Stupid Me, I am not Jake. I do agree that he is correct with the restrictions for use of the taser. You stupid are incorrect. I stand by what I said that until restrictions are lifted it would be more of an inconvenience or hazard than a help to carry a taser. Why should we waste money when we already have sidearms. As the law currently stands, it would be dangerous to equip our officers with tasers.
Stupid Me
8:21 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
If jake and John are different people, I am humpty dumpty
John
8:41 am on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Then I guess you sat on a wall and had a great fall
Jake
7:14 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Stupidme: You neglected to provide evidence of your claim that John and I are misinformed on NJ taser policy.
John McQuarty
3:24 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012
If the police department is so understaffed, I question why someone in broad daylight would be followed into a gas station for using a cell phone. This so-called "violent offender" was only guilty initially of using a cell phone. Just to let everyone know, this "violent offender" had NO criminal record and absolutely NO history of any problems EVER with the police. The car was impounded and thoroughly checked for weapons and guess what??, no weapons, no drugs, NOTHING!! It is interesting how a 6ft 5inch, 275lb. black man is immediately identified by all as a violent offender and a shame that the WHITE cop felt the same way. I say look at the camera and the audio in the police car and maybe something slightly different occurred. The white volunteer fireman and board member of the community may not be the most reliable witness.
Missy Webb
9:29 pm on Friday, May 11, 2012
Mr McQuarty, Why are you putting color into this. How do you even know the police and the bystander were white. You are just assumming this, unless you know them yourself. as it's been said before When you assume you make a a$$$$$$ out of yourself.